From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 4 11:32:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E6D96A for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 11:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EC612AC for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 11:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FED4000C for ; Sat, 4 May 2013 10:17:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id F19844000D; Sat, 4 May 2013 10:17:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (h-45-105.a163.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADDA84000C; Sat, 4 May 2013 10:17:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3b2jk3112mz8hVn; Sat, 4 May 2013 10:17:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id R6ehjoT6x2wy; Sat, 4 May 2013 10:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [10.1.0.4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3b2jk032FNz8hVm; Sat, 4 May 2013 10:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (celes.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::3]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3b2jk02Jqqz9Ctq; Sat, 4 May 2013 10:17:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5184C406.80704@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 10:17:10 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beeblebrox Subject: Re: xorg-devel x11/libxcb build error References: <1367597502194-5808580.post@n5.nabble.com> <51843212.2010101@freebsd.org> <1367646115297-5808694.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1367646115297-5808694.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130503-1, 2013-05-03), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 11:32:07 -0000 On 2013-05-04 07:41, Beeblebrox wrote: > Hi. > >> There should already be a port x11/xcb-proto in xorg-dev, and also in the >> regular ports tree, so there should be no need to create the port. > > I did not do any modification to the ports tree - it seems fine. After > poudriere was unable to build because of the "missing package" not found in > the repository, creating a package for xcb-proto and placing it in the repo > fixes this error - ie poudriere completes the build for package libxcb > >> If you have trouble building xcb-proto > No problem there, as explained above. > > As you know, if there is a package which the poudriere build que depends on > or which it requires for the build process, then poudriere checks the repo > for this package and if it finds that it is missing in the repo, it then > adds the missing dependent package into the build que automatically so as to > prevent a similar error like the above. Since we are getting this error, > poudriere is not calculating the depends tree/process correctly. This also > could be a poudriere issue, but not likely. This sounds like a poudriere issue then, but I can't tell anything without further logs. I have never had any trouble building the xorg-dev packages using poudriere. Regards! -- Niclas