From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jun 26 12:31:27 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12845
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 12:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA12829
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 12:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA00302;
	Sat, 27 Jun 1998 05:31:12 +1000
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 05:31:12 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199806261931.FAA00302@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@polstra.com
Subject: Re: CPU accounting seems a bit off
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>idle.  Is this merely inaccuracy, or is it genuine brokenness?  (Or
>is there a difference between the two?)

It's brokenness.  Time for fork is counted twice.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message