From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 14:17:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC48016A41F for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill.marquette@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F1643D45 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill.marquette@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t15so610448wxc for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 07:17:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YBPVdh16TxAvoDLv+uF+C2Md0ZzkJPnpgVMlK/XyOp1w/NObpT7Oscr7xkUEnIpuJm6SVQIBboKA6vM4CCb/GDANLWgCtZBwL6iYsr2YojHmIB67mytK1RVGR3+iQct1KILYLUpVEFQ6e+Alq4mUGYmSgPvpzalUDbP9R10Y21A= Received: by 10.70.71.1 with SMTP id t1mr2415246wxa; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.89.12 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55e8a96c0510220651t47fa063ayefd1dcffd63950a6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:51:21 -0500 From: Bill Marquette To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4359ED5B.7010303@dequim.ist.utl.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <000b01c5d644$54527f20$0132a8c0@delta> <4359ED5B.7010303@dequim.ist.utl.pt> Subject: Re: FreeBSD + MPD + PF + ALTQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:17:42 -0000 On 10/22/05, Bruno Afonso wrote: > The download part is the problematic one IF they're not all connected to > the same network interface. Why ? Because altq only works PER interface > and tun0, tun1, tun2, etc are each and single one, one interface on its o= wn. > > You basically have to > > altq on tun0 > > altq on tun1, etc.. > > What we would need in this case would be a meta-interface that altq > would work on, but that is not available. Bottom line: you can't control > with PF global bw over an interface-span. This is probably necessary for > a full commercial deployment. Don't know of any plans to implement this..= . > > meta_if {tun0, tun1} > > altq on meta_1 ... > > would be nice. :-) You mean something like: altq on { fxp0 fxp1 } bandwidth 100Mb hfsc queue { a b } queue a bandwidth 50Mb hfsc(default) queue b bandwidth 50Mb hfsc This works today :) --Bill