From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 17 13: 4:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B9C37B400; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0HJQRS00609; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:26:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Bruce Evans Cc: "Brian F. Feldman" , Max Khon , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: request for review In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:58:19 +1100." <20020116155420.N487-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 20:26:27 +0100 Message-ID: <607.1011295587@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020116155420.N487-100000@gamplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans writes: >On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > >> Bruce Evans wrote: >> > POSIX.1-2001 specifies st_blksize. >> >> Great, right after I get POSIX.1-1996 ;) So how does it specify st_blksize, >> then? > >The same as the quote from www.opengroup.org in the comment in vn_stat(). >It says nothing important that isn't in that quote. Well, the one thing missing in this thread is the concensus on what value to return when no value can be said to make any amount of sense for devices in general and zero is considered illegal. What's the verdict ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message