From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 27 23:01:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B3CF04; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:01:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F69B29B0; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id g12so6655685oah.20 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:01:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RfgC2KV0LKMGCVG6JqSomKnmu2YcHd1ug1xbQphfBjY=; b=xJ0oGELqGdexP4uTM3emTdeYm+EXwJyyj4/95xnkQxfitwBarRMCsLgWzVAl2JROJf aqq/O9XlLJg6aa6s1VD1byk/TQuE5diMpaOLcWjogvY7VushArV000eW4G2MvSA6x+5Q srL2syEeoNCn8xp15lQOYLxEaWbP0+Zc9BYO1kXf//IpkQJ1z9Hg7XzlTnAtJze1CBOa E+vjfaPQaPvnYTFdp40WLCEpxCFeAbHgsAxGWxE5DnyT2gYp8qUecVju2Vd4XZKCiK0G 7xSrWsmu4CSX9JCjMS9r/uekCsdiMGTu5WvYsZSwdzec+UQgKMfeu0l3e/Pax9smHGHw kilw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.71.37 with SMTP id r5mr4140311obu.22.1377644514789; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.2.110 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:01:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130825141942.GB19969@lonrach.local> References: <20130822202027.GH94127@funkthat.com> <20130823151615.GD41379@roberto02-aw.erc.corp.eurocontrol.int> <20130823180413.GL94127@funkthat.com> <20130823182752.GA15392@lonrach.local> <20130825141942.GB19969@lonrach.local> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:01:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: patch to improve AES-NI performance From: Outback Dingo To: Ollivier Robert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:01:55 -0000 On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Ollivier Robert: > > You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the "code" one. > > FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 in stable/9 as it is a > prerequesite to apply jmg's patch. I've asked re@ whether they would > consider this for 9.2. It is very late in the 9.2 release circle but that > patch has been in 10 for more than a year now... > > So this patch can now be applied to STABLE/9 for testing on a local system since these 3 revisions are now in?? > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- > roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >