From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 05:56:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9E9106566B; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:56:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.critical.ch (cl-8.zrh-02.ch.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1620:f00:7::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345FD8FC08; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beaver.home.critical.ch (80-218-148-45.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.218.148.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.critical.ch (8.14.3/8.14.3/critical-1.0) with ESMTP id o8S5unee048231; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:56:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:56:49 +0200 From: Emanuel Haupt To: Alexey Dokuchaev Message-Id: <20100928075649.c3bcb0a9.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100928024255.GA61304@FreeBSD.org> References: <201009272151.o8RLpA8I002279@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100928024255.GA61304@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/screenie Makefile pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:56:51 -0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:51:10PM +0000, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > ehaupt 2010-09-27 21:51:10 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > sysutils/screenie Makefile pkg-descr > > Log: > > - Drop maintainership > > - Mark DEPRECATED, development has been ceased and is no longer > > maintained > > - Set EXPIRATION_DATE to one month from now > > But the port does not look BROKEN, why deprecating it? I mean, it > can still be useful for some people despite that development ceased. It is not BROKEN but as Doug pointed out, I felt that this port has passed the point of its usefulnes. With currently 4835 unmaintained ports in our tree I took a bit more aggressive aproach and marked it for deletion. If until then no one steps in, it will leave a reference in MOVED and can always be brought back. However, extending the expiration date to 3 months seems like a good idea, that way automated reminder mails (are there still mechanisms?) can reach a larger audience of possible interested people. Emanuel