From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 5 11:09:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C5316A41C for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 11:09:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ah@crypta.net) Received: from mail.crypta.net (mail.crypta.net [83.136.131.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D9643D48 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 11:09:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ah@crypta.net) Received: by mail.crypta.net (cryptobank/eProtect-smtpd, from userid 1001) id 27F08ECD48F; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:09:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:09:29 +0200 From: Andy Hilker To: Mark Andrews Message-ID: <20050705110929.GA95769@mail.crypta.net> References: <20050704213546.GA47314@mail.crypta.net> <200507050457.j654vA8m085481@drugs.dv.isc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507050457.j654vA8m085481@drugs.dv.isc.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEC6E1071 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9B2E 5892 AD93 D5C5 FB8E 3912 35D6 951B EC6E 1071 Organization: cryptobank - Andy Hilker Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4-p3 and bind9: isc_mutex_init failed in new_adbfind / exited on signal 11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:09:39 -0000 Hi, You (Mark Andrews) wrote: > FreeBSD's pthread_mutex_init() (isc_mutext_init()) can fail > if there is no memory. On most other OS this is not the case. > > The callers to isc_mutext_init() assume that a failure is due > to a double initialision and as a result log a error message > when it fails. Memory allocation failures on the other hand > are not logged. Thanks for your reply. I think I have found the "reason". I have configured datasize value lower than max-cache-size. Obviously this makes no sense. Now I am waiting if it runs stable again. bye, Andy