From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 24 23:24:46 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA07698 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 23:24:46 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA07689 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 23:24:43 -0800 Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id XAA14704; Fri, 24 Nov 1995 23:24:18 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199511250724.XAA14704@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: kernel_compile_problem To: js@ibbs.anaheim.ca.us (Jeff Stillinger) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 1995 23:24:18 -0800 (PST) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Jeff Stillinger" at Nov 24, 95 09:58:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 520 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > you removed the entry in the config for npx this is needed for software floating point as well as h/w floating suport.. it is NOT OPTIONAL (as you discovered) > Hi, > > kernel at all. What I am trying to accomplish is a smaller kernel > without the "dead" code that never gets used. I would also like to take > advantage of my 387. you need npx for this.. npx is the 387 driver it also drives the 387 EMULATOR if you don't have a 387 > > # device npx0 at isa? port "IO_NPX" irq 13 vector npxintr ^ see?