From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 13:44:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170FC16A41C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:44:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C954D43D48 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:44:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE3F60FC; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590B260FB; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3B2AC33C29; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:44:30 +0200 (CEST) To: Michal Mertl References: <86slzcos9q.fsf@xps.des.no> <1119360396.781.17.camel@genius1.i.cz> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:44:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1119360396.781.17.camel@genius1.i.cz> (Michal Mertl's message of "Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:26:36 +0200") Message-ID: <86zmtjn7sx.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/5.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no Cc: Charles Sprickman , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Nagios and threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:44:36 -0000 Michal Mertl writes: > Yes, the description on Nagios page is not precise but unfortunately > Nagios still has some problems even on 5.4. I wasn't able to find out > what was wrong and the problem dissappeared when I had to replace the > computer with single-processor one. The symptoms I observed were that > every several days one Nagios process was consuming all the CPU doing > hundreds of thousands of syscalls per second. hundreds of thousands of *which* syscalls? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no