From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  5 11:48:10 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 66C0237B401; Mon,  5 May 2003 11:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spider.deepcore.dk
	(cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4226643F3F; Mon,  5 May 2003 11:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) id h45Im5Xn006095;
	Mon, 5 May 2003 20:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soeren Schmidt <sos@spider.deepcore.dk>
Message-Id: <200305051848.h45Im5Xn006095@spider.deepcore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20030505181709.GA67509@servidor1.cursosvirtuales.com.a>
To: Fernando Schapachnik <fernando@schapachnik.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 20:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL98b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: kern/44508: 4.7R boot delay on ata
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 18:48:10 -0000

It seems Fernando Schapachnik wrote:
> En un mensaje anterior, Søren Schmidt escribió:
> > There was a few changes in this area, but its not possible to
> > avoid all dealys here (the spec calls for a 30s wait for slow
> > devices).
> 
> Hi,
> 	What about showing a leyend like "waiting for ... according to spec".
> This gets closer to POLA. Agreed, is a very minor thing.

Hmm, thats an idea actually, I'll put in on my TODO list...

-Søren