From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 6 23:43:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12D71065670; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net) Received: from vniz.net (vniz.net [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101E88FC08; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vniz.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q76NhMqg080726; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 03:43:23 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@vniz.net) Received: (from ache@localhost) by localhost (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q76NhM2T080725; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 03:43:22 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 03:43:21 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Dimitry Andric Message-ID: <20120806234320.GA80675@vniz.net> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Dimitry Andric , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG References: <201208061844.q76IixiN069430@svn.freebsd.org> <50201471.4060208@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50201471.4060208@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: svn commit: r239100 - head/lib/libpam/modules/pam_unix X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:43:33 -0000 On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 09:01:05PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-08-06 20:44, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Author: dim > > Date: Mon Aug 6 18:44:59 2012 > > New Revision: 239100 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/239100 > > > > Log: > > Fix an instance in pam_krb5(8), where the variable 'user' could be used > > uninitialized. > > Ehm, this was obviously meant as pam_unix instead, sorry. :) Could you please look at misc/170373 while you are there? -- http://ache.vniz.net/