From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 02:13:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EF8495; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abc@ai1.alaska.net) Received: from ai1.alaska.net (ai1.alaska.net [209.112.188.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24348FC08; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from abc@localhost) by ai1.alaska.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) id q9Q2D6VX090827; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:13:06 GMT (envelope-from abc@ai1.alaska.net) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:13:06 GMT From: Abc Xyz Message-Id: <201210260213.q9Q2D6VX090827@ai1.alaska.net> To: ak@FreeBSD.org X-URL: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=vtwm&stype=all X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.8.5rel.4 X-Personal_Name: : Chad Subject: FreeBSD Port: vtwm-5.4.7_3 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:13:43 -0000 Why is "rplay" being packaged with VTWM? VTWM is supposed to be a minimal no-frills window manager (I have used it for 15 years) and I very much dislike the added dependencies for things I don't care to use and violate the spirit of VTWM. I wrote the programmer that did this hack several years ago when he first did it, and he promised he would undo it. And now, I see it back again (still using 4.11, was thinking of upgrading to 9.1). Please keep VTWM *minimal*. If someone wants fancy things like "network sound", I am sure one of the more fancy window managers will do.