From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 18 10:59:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143B61B5 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CCD8E5 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o45so4675774wer.37 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 03:59:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to:x-gm-message-state; bh=cMHfLzpKGDhHEamcf7tUgBFiQWhybZ+bo4nLH5aiKZk=; b=CLwRmq9uZLIijpOkaMcixR16nf85kBBukVGHVzghw9uireCASWKAI87AhIF/Lo4b+g H5n+cxNBa2horwcypqtRDbE9A2mvacUvkkB2xPW0r9qi6qetSsYIf+3fo34z6ROOl387 uC0fm5vRvD6SxT/mKHcTTx2XS/zbgsxXCLgSQPrQs53cuDcFjEVZsBWURK3pVaDB9zt1 vjzEJiXf9eND4xT3aTolttbGPk3SGtRdzicE8A8w/8KGOcTo9Kobkty0KE/6LeYCL7C7 83VnH9Lvjf6Lw+db76jij4YjbFCq2zGdXBTE+jelrrZjel8S8WPQY62HiCqjuqoHuVGY ehaA== X-Received: by 10.194.9.166 with SMTP id a6mr23181858wjb.2.1363595017784; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.136.187.126] ([92.90.16.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f1sm12002542wib.0.2013.03.18.01.23.35 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 01:23:36 -0700 (PDT) References: <3B04FCB1-D0D4-4BC9-BB15-5221F438738C@my.gd> <514594D7.1020202@norma.perm.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <514594D7.1020202@norma.perm.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <39FC9737-4F34-4978-BDFE-17410CD2E5C4@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B144) From: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: carp regression in 9.1 ? Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:23:13 +0100 To: "Eugene M. Zheganin" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlA8srPET82GkGbs2J5mlLVCRWfGcK+p6S3hWueTsmDUVmHKyTKNmrJ481Qh73CAl4jS+D9 Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:59:21 -0000 On 17 Mar 2013, at 11:03, "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote: > Hi. >=20 > On 14.03.2013 20:47, Fleuriot Damien wrote: >> I'm experiencing this odd behavior with 9.1 r24791 for amd64. > You should definitely sit on 8.x until 10.x will become stable, or upgrade= to 10.x from 9.x (at least this is what I do). > Carp is entirely rewritten in 10.x branch. In the same time, in 9.x carp s= eems to be desperately broken: for example I was experiencing weird panics o= n boot, weird behaviour, and, when enabling WITNESS, lots of carp-related LO= Rs. Furthermore, I was completely unable to boot up with a ipv6-enabled carp= - I had to initialize it in multiuser with a custom script. All of this doe= sn't happen on 10.x, which I had to upgrade to. Right now, if we're talking a= bout carp, my 10.x production works like a charm. 9.x branch just isn't dest= ined to production. The situation is a bit improved on 9.1, but still I can c= ompare this release to 4.6 or 5.0. >=20 > Eugene. >=20 I'm afraid I can't afford 10.x, this is for production, although I acknowle= dge the problems you're faced with. Regarding 8.x, this is a guest VM running on proxmox 2.3 which doesn't suppo= rt stock 8.x (need the virtio kernel option, I'll get a thread reference whe= n I hit work). So yeah I'm kinda fucked here... ;)=