From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 19 05:45:07 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA21774
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 19 May 1995 05:45:07 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA21768
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 May 1995 05:45:03 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA12670
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Fri, 19 May 1995 07:19:17 -0500
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA08888; 19 May 95 07:10:00 CDT (Fri)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id HAA08885; Fri, 19 May 1995 07:10:00 -0500
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199505191210.HAA08885@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: pcnfsd or bwnfsd
To: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 07:09:59 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: dufault@hda.com, babkin@hq.icb.chel.su, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199505191019.DAA10561@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=" at May 19, 95 03:19:45 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 490       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Um...I guess we can't put the source code on the CDROM but the binary
> package is ok.  Is that the correct interpretation?

Ask them what they mean by "don't charge money for the source code". Many
places that say that have no problem with having the source on a CDROM along
with a bunch of other packages. Others have an aversion to CDROM distribution.
Since they allow binary distribution I suspect they just don't want you
charging extra for the source above and beyond the binaries.