From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 13 3:15:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.welearn.com.au (phoenix.welearn.com.au [139.130.44.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2195837B8A1 for ; Sat, 13 May 2000 03:15:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jon@phoenix.welearn.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by phoenix.welearn.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA39077 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 May 2000 20:15:17 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jon) Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 20:15:15 +1000 From: Jonathan Michaels To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: curious about memory report usingfreebsd v3.3-release Message-ID: <20000513201513.A39032@phoenix.welearn.com.au> Reply-To: jon@welearn.com.au Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG all, i'm about to make the leap into freebsd 3.0-stable. to get thier i will be installing v3.3-release over the top of my existing installation, being an established freebsd v2.2.8-release workstation. my question is why does the freebsd installation bootstrap diskette report my (home built -- from quality, new parts on a supermicro motherboard p6sne) pentium pro's systm memory as being only 639 kbyte .. shouldn't it be 640 kbyte ?? is this going to cause any problems down the track ? i've had freebsd v2.2.8-release and v2.2.7-release run properly on this 128 mbyte with aha2940uw and smc9432tx ethernet card. both ran flawlessly for about a year each. i'm more curious than anyting else. warm regards jonathan -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message