From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 21 16:01:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5DA1065672; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608F68FC1B; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.16] (helo=6.mx.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.70 #1) id 1NXzTf-0004pJ-WC; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:01:48 +0100 Received: from p57ae1dcd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.29.205]:40095 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 6.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1NXzTf-0001o1-NE; Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:01:47 +0100 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:01:46 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20100121170146.672acbbd@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4B5873EA.6020507@FreeBSD.org> References: <201001210247.o0L2lno8035853@fire.js.berklix.net> <4B5873EA.6020507@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" Subject: Re: Suggestion: A new variable for a few Makefiles: IS_BINARY X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:01:49 -0000 On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:34:02 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > On 1/20/2010 6:47 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Some may not don't mind > > installing binaries from elsewhere, but FreeSBD could protect more, > > What is it that you're trying to protect people from? In other words, > what bad thing do you think is going to happen if someone installs a > binary, and why do you think that we would allow something dangerous > into the ports collection in the first place? > I know Julian very well and he's, umm, very cautious. I assume he wants a knob he can turn on to avoid installing binaries while doing unattended installations, i.e. with BATCH set to yes. --- Gary Jennejohn