From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 15 17:29:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8749B1065678 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuexen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CCE8FC20 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.190] (p508FC88F.dip.t-dialin.net [80.143.200.143]) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6D81C0C0BD4; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:29:09 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <1279212602.31311.151.camel@soundwave> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:31:01 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <84875A93-3851-476E-8F2E-A7008CA6BD5C@FreeBSD.org> References: <1275419919.30057.50.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <20100601193733.GA44816@icarus.home.lan> <4C3CBC1E.9030106@omnilan.de> <1279212377.31311.144.camel@soundwave> <1279212602.31311.151.camel@soundwave> To: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-stable , Steve Polyack , Brandon Gooch , Sean McAfee , Harald Schmalzbauer , Jack Vogel , Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: em(4) duplex problems with 82541EI on RELENG_8, -CURRENT on PowerEdge 1850 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:29:12 -0000 On Jul 15, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: >=20 >> It may have gone in before the RELENG_8_1 tag/branch occurred? SVN >> r209309 >>=20 >> Jacks's change went into stable/8 on June 18: >>=20 >=20 > Also, did anyone provide feedback on SVN r209959 to > head/sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c ? =20 >=20 > It's saying "8.1 MFC", so you might want to ask people to test that on > stable/8 then expedite the 8.1 MFC as well. Maybe Jack can MFC it to stable/8. MFCing to releng/8.1 must come from = stable/8 anyway. There is no need for re@ approval to MFC it into stable/8. Best regards Michael >=20 > ~BAS