From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 28 15:52:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21EEB46 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8535160A for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id pa12so6243899veb.16 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 07:52:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sqAfcqLQRbvkYiWR9SRVIZOKTkBkVw4OBfSkbngcBE0=; b=NNyTEPnJnXT9mpDA9xRwEmcr/L5LOYQ0lER6ZbKz34z+iwg9SGDEegQwN3F62USYeh Sy5eYLZAVAnqNLy2heze5wA5tunAPzoffwOK2YMzmP3MWPybZOdIbHZ+SaUwQTVDIY3I M7GONLOHNtJ3BMW2pOeaj4ZUwT72nDFmURhty0xWE1VZAj7m4B1uOXGeMuLdBQbNXcXv hw1hZHs7kI2Iufps8nzdpJaTBSV82i9SAkADfHMZ20x+4RQI71CLy2Sjz04X4Bp3yq5b Afc5VRgNVNjFmSpfK/Vzq7CogZra8WBzrNBhvD1h+NB2JBaLj+ooG9UoRWH6P9UjEPe6 Kq1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.144.80 with SMTP id y16mr38971377vcu.4.1385653945004; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 07:52:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.59.135 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 07:52:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52976210.7040709@thanelange.no> References: <5256D59A.20904@digiware.nl> <5256DD29.6090007@freebsd.org> <14A565E7-7D26-4C32-B73A-F5FAA16BC837@digiware.nl> <9A4BF6B0-91F1-43C5-B5D5-90486123336D@digiware.nl> <525738CE.9000708@freebsd.org> <525C837E.7060302@freebsd.org> <525CF0A1.6060600@digiware.nl> <5295FDE6.4060307@thanelange.no> <52965B07.7060307@callfortesting.org> <52976210.7040709@thanelange.no> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:52:24 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running bhyve on a AMD 1075T Phenom From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Gyrd Thane Lange Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:52:27 -0000 On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Gyrd Thane Lange wrote: > Den 27. nov. 2013 21:50, skrev Michael Dexter: > > On 11/27/13 6:12 AM, Gyrd Thane Lange wrote: >> >>> I appears the AMD patches for the vmm module have not made it to CURRENT >>> yet. Would it be easy to prepare a patch-set? Or give me some hints on >>> how to do it myself? >>> >> >> Correct. Did you try one of the SVM snapshots linked at bhyve.org or >> build a bhyve-svm project branch yourself? >> > > This is my main machine at home that is in continual use for everything, > so I'm hoping to avoid changing to a different branch. But I can briefly > try dual booting with a spare disk containing the project branch to find > out if my machine supports bhyve at all. > > To clarify: I'm already aware of the bhyve-svm project branch, but rather > than run the full branch I'm hoping for some insight into which commits (in > the branch) are essential in running bhyve on AMD. > > Gyrd ^_^ > > For what it is worth, I have many AMD cpu's and I am waiting to do more testing when amd-svm hits the HEAD branch... I test so many patches, that running a separate project branch is complex. are we close to merging svm to HEAD? -- Sam Fourman Jr.