From owner-cvs-all Wed Sep 29 5:45:56 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4491507D; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA20461; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:45:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA70745; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:45:47 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:45:46 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Bruce Evans , Poul-Henning Kamp , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf LINT Message-ID: <19990929144546.H70023@bitbox.follo.net> References: <25018.938558832@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <25018.938558832@localhost> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I thought it was intentional (to keep soft updates linted). We don't > > distribute binaries for LINT. > > No, but LINT is supposed to compile all the way through so you can > also lint everything after the point where the soft updates object > builds would fail due to missing symlinks on a "stock" system. :) The question is who uses LINT as a compile tool (as opposed to a reference tool). I think having softupdates in there makes sensel; my comment to phk was due to this being an obvious side-effect change, not something that seemed to be done deliberately. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message