From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 13:59:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0952106566B for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krichy@tvnetwork.hu) Received: from krichy.tvnetwork.hu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:be00:0:2::10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA6E8FC0C for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4189216B2; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA266203CC; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:59:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Kojedzinszky To: "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <4F8AAEF7.3090800@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Message-ID: References: <4F8AAEF7.3090800@zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:59:57 -0000 Thank you for the reply. Unfortunately, dont know why, but on my xen virtualised environment, fbsd amd64 domU performs much slower, not only 30 times. Without multilabel, file creation speed is around 2500/s, but with multilabels enabled, it is only 15/s (!). so it is more than 100 times slower. And anyway freebsd is known to be fast as well, as functional. The power to serve. :) But in my environment, 15/s file creation is very-very slow. The hardware is a q6700 cpu with 4G ram, 2x1T sata disks in raid1, the host runs linux. I think with this hw the mentioned speed is really slow. Regards, Kojedzinszky Richard Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. On Sun, 15 Apr 2012, O. Hartmann wrote: > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:20:23 +0200 > From: O. Hartmann > To: Richard Kojedzinszky > Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd) > > Am 04/14/12 21:37, schrieb Richard Kojedzinszky: >> Dear list, >> >> Although it is not only security-related question, I did not get any >> answer from freebsd-performance. The original question is below. >> >> Can someone give some advice? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> >> Kojedzinszky Richard >> Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:16:57 +0100 (CET) >> From: Richard Kojedzinszky >> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org >> Subject: ufs multilabel performance >> >> Dear List, >> >> I've noticed that when I enable multilabel on an fs, a file creation >> gets around 20-30 times slower than without multilabel set. >> >> This one-liner can be used to test the differences: >> $ truss -D perl -e 'open(F, ">$_.file") for 1 .. 1000' > > Same here, creating files seems to be 10 - 30 times slower with > multilabels as it is without. > > But as several posts and discussions reflects, FreeBSD isn't supposed to > be fast although it is claimed that writing is the major than reading; > FBSD should serve functionality. >> >> And one can see that the open call takes much more when multilabel is >> set on an fs. It seems that only file creation needs that many time, >> when a file exists it is opened much faster. >> >> Could someone acknowledge this, and have some suggestions how to make it >> faster? >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Kojedzinszky Richard >> TvNetWork Nyrt. >> E-mail: krichy (at) tvnetwork [dot] hu >> PGP: 0x54B2BF0C8F59B1B7 >> Fingerprint = F6D4 3FFE AF03 CACF 0DCB 46A1 54B2 BF0C 8F59 B1B7 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >