From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 28 18:10:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684C7B04; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:10:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B09CCC5; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc27-cmbg15-2-0-cust235.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [86.27.188.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4SIASrA043367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 28 May 2013 18:10:29 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: [CFT] gcc: support for barcelona From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <521EEFA1-E116-41F5-B618-238E7AA092A8@bsdimp.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:10:23 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3C29AD82-077D-4E6B-94C7-5D069A130348@FreeBSD.org> References: <51A38CBD.6000702@FreeBSD.org> <51A3B8AB.5080808@FreeBSD.org> <521EEFA1-E116-41F5-B618-238E7AA092A8@bsdimp.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:37:26 +0000 Cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org, toolchain@FreeBSD.org, Pedro Giffuni , Rui Paulo X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 18:10:49 -0000 On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote: > That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's = still many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS support. = There's 0 chance it will be gone in 10... I disagree. There is a significant chance that gcc in base will be gone = for all Tier 1 platforms in 10.0. There are still some reasons to want = gcc installed, but there are no compelling reasons to want an ancient = version of gcc installed on x86[-64] or ARM. For people who need gcc, = the ports collection provides a selection of recent versions. David