_X11).
>> >
>> >  >>>> Bye,
>> >
>> >  Alexander.
>> >
>> >  >>> >>> So pkg is right your package does not provide anymore the libraries >>> mosh requires!
>> >
>> >  >>> libabsl_strings is not in the provides.
>> >
>> > >
>> > > >> On the poudriere builder:
>> > >
>> > >  # tar -tvf >> /space/poudriere/data/packages/poudriere-bastille-default/All/abseil-20230125.3.pkg >> | grep libabsl_strings
>> > >
>> > >  lrwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 0 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so -> libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0
>> > >
>> > >  -rwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 99600 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings.so.2301.0.0
>> > >
>> > >  lrwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 0 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so -> >> libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0
>> > >
>> > >  -rwxr-xr-x 0 root wheel 9536 10 Apr. 00:22 >> /usr/local/lib/libabsl_strings_internal.so.2301.0.0
>> > >
>> > >  >> Bye,
>> > >
>> > >  Alexander.
>> > >
>> > >  > > > The thing it means it is that some of the .so files from devel/abseil > are not generated in a way that prevents pkg from extracting the SONAME > properly which has a big change to come from one of your non default > option (unrelated to x11 because the port has no x11 option)
>> > >
>> >
>> >  So it highlights a real problem
>> >
>> 
>> I've rebuild the abseil package and reinstalled it on the system in 
>> question. It was rebuild with an updated poudriere-devel 
>> (poudriere-git-3.4.99.20240424). Now pkg check -d doesn't complain 
>> about missing stuff anymore, and the raw pkg info output lists 
>> libabsl_strings.
>> 
>> Bye,
>> 
>> Alexander.
>> 
> 
> 
> Great, now the interesting part would be to know why the abseil package 
> had to be rebuilt in the first place, aka what was caussing the issue 
> either on the .so files themselves, or what potential bug of pkg was 
> trigger which made it unable to analyse properly those file.
> 
> Do you have a copy of the abseil package with the wrong 
> shlibs_provides?
> If yes I would love to be able to analyse it.

Uh, oh.... no. I used rm, not mv before rebuilding. And no zfs snapshot 
of packages or a backup of /var/cache/pkg or poudriere-builds.

And given that I see strange socket behavior on the -current system I 
could imagine (depending on how the package building is handled) that it 
may or may not be an issue inside pkg.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.org    netchild@FreeBSD.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF

--=_9bf95c8b848e753507a2e6c226159477
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
 name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=signature.asc;
 size=833
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEER9UlYXp1PSd08nWXEg2wmwP42IYFAmYzRrgACgkQEg2wmwP4
2IZZfg//VMW8zNxeviBv3DpzORIRbzZbaS5X+Y2X9uaE0M6ymRkFMtBx98uvhFeT
kQpvUx6ubN+2VChyjgQplRaPFaV/pO2JTji6aNuV/74UlKP9UpV9InImqLNUqgaB
flhXJOFzKjT3+RZWD9azIqXhdZEFwbzvj8grViwEXBCzD6PA0YtIWvtWbDT2lBcB
ISkgzQIXVS0H6ppUPlpvJcKt54RYngnjPHkEU2Qaj6fgFcoI4nuPHVp8teA8VBrR
SYHzyJinalszYrBTr3JEg8mj+jJXIBstIQKiRRt9Ldy4F9cq5G6h2Zr0OvQcxfvk
3A1p2v9oh915Nj80Xfk/eRsPrwOr9AMwkw30AAmcGMN2f6pub69HEbY0XYPAdsV6
cM+u/8/6zztoS2vkQVnaOIpFXciMjTpZwNkhOcHmWueAFXe/4VVE/KnMEUmys5mC
haT0Wjv1i84upaoWco1tB29g3PThug3Sjw4a4tBwim2AQ+dcl9oU4UUZddrzH0zK
5Uu5gsVzk7WI6IjFtcm1hhHTyoNVjCautRhOwP2EYq1b6x9J9Zt9wSjk19ynfEjT
4QqYdKBT9QRI57zL17/3f32769YqweP0Wz2GIWZMRZ/7RqMe5D3WFs7sfzUmkUFk
mytGF8u63kxc3dr7aq40IbKWqvSumsnBakgG++cdHjBFq8VMeOo=
=KHsh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_9bf95c8b848e753507a2e6c226159477--