From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Feb 19 22: 0:25 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE8E37B41B
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8])
          by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
          id <20020220060010.COKK2951.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>;
          Wed, 20 Feb 2002 06:00:10 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA60619;
	Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:59:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Eugene Panchenko <replicator@ngs.ru>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Task activation delays: FreeBSD versus Linux?
In-Reply-To: <web-9970027@intranet.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0202192158080.60489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

define a "task activation delay" and maybe we can discuss it..

it's a rather broad definition.
and is that RTlinux? (which is a completly differnt kettle of fish..)

On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Eugene Panchenko wrote:

> gretings.
>=20
> As seen on kerneltrap.org:
> ---
> Andrew Morton: Ingo Molnar broke the ground here with his
> 2.2.12 patch which demonstrated that Linux could fairly
> easily yield task activation delays which are one to two
> orders of magnitude better than any competing operating
> system.=20
> ---
>=20
> is this a truth ? about "orders of magnitude" ? does FreeBSD
> fall under "any competing operating system"?
>=20
> thankyou
> ____________________________________________________________
> =F3=C4=C5=CC=C1=CA=D4=C5 =D3=C5=C2=C5 =D0=CF=C4=C1=D2=CF=CB - http://ngs.=
ru/tovar
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>=20


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message