From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 5 23:01:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA03811 for current-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 23:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA03806 Mon, 5 Feb 1996 23:01:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA01709; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 23:01:18 -0800 To: uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org (Frank Durda IV) cc: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sup%d is broken - I agree In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Feb 1996 22:36:00 +0700." Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 23:01:17 -0800 Message-ID: <1707.823590077@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > I must also report similar problems: > [details of sup2..supn dysfunction elided] Well, I'm glad you're reporting them, that's all I can really say. Truly! I think that central resources should be flagged ASAP when broken and people should take Extra Special Care in making sure they run right, just as we jump up and down and run around in paniced circles whenever freefall starts having problems. We might not fix things right away, but we certainly manage to look busy! :-) Any suggestions on promoting and facilitating this level of reliability? Would an `admin' mailing list for all FreeBSD.ORG related resources help, or would it merely turn into a source of unwanted messages for admins who already get too much mail? It certainly doesn't seem like such reports should be sent to hackers, anyway. There's too much traffic there. Jordan