From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 20:15:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA2316A41F for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:15:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@thedarkside.nl) Received: from mail.thelostparadise.com (129pc197.sshunet.nl [145.97.197.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA9843D55 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:15:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pieter@thedarkside.nl) Received: from [195.16.84.90] (serkoon@jura.thelostparadise.com [195.16.84.90] (may be forged)) by mail.thelostparadise.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7NKFtXY011840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:15:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pieter@thedarkside.nl) Message-ID: <430B83FB.6020008@thedarkside.nl> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:15:55 +0200 From: Pieter de Boer User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Grooms References: <430B5680.1060506@shrew.net> <430B6785.7040209@thedarkside.nl> <430B75DC.9050003@shrew.net> In-Reply-To: <430B75DC.9050003@shrew.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: odd tcpdump output w/ 6.0-BETA2 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:15:58 -0000 Matthew Grooms wrote: >>> Is anyone else seeing this issue? I get useless output from tcpdump ( no >>> header or protocol decode ) but only when I specify a filter on the >>> command line. >>> listening on xl0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes >>> 11:33:32.920031 [|ether] >>> 11:33:35.203998 [|ether] >> I've seen this too and heard from someone else with the same problem. >> Both 6.0-BETA2 systems. I upgraded mine to a newer version of 6.0-BETA2, >> using cvsup, but can't remember nor test (at least during this week) if >> that fixed the problem. > Did you make modifications or are were you running GENERIC? The only > modifications I made to my kernel were to disable IPV6 and to enable pf, > pflog, ALTQ and FAST_IPSEC. I've made quite some changes, yes: removing drivers I don't need, adding pf.. Doubt it's a problem in the kernel configuration, sounds more like a problem in libpcap or bpf.. -- Pieter