From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 17:53:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81C016A4CE; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:53:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harik.murex.com (mail.murex.com [194.98.239.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110F843D46; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from interscan.fr.murex.com (iscan.murex.fr [172.21.17.207] (may be forged)) by harik.murex.com with ESMTP id j2AHh4bW000178; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from mxmail.murex.com (interscan.murex.fr [127.0.0.1]) by interscan.fr.murex.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2AI2gd30117; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:02:45 +0100 Received: from mteterin.us.murex.com ([172.21.130.86]) by mxmail.murex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:53:16 +0100 From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Erez Zadok Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:53:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200503100128.j2A1SP4h014420@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> In-Reply-To: <200503100128.j2A1SP4h014420@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503101253.20876.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2005 17:53:17.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[09D62E70:01C5259A] cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: What about inode file system? (Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:53:56 -0000 A few years ago, there was a project making a filesystem, where a file's name will simply be its inode number. It was intended to save on the name-to-inode lookups of a regular filesystem, for applications like Squid, which keep file names in some sort of a database already. Does anyone know, what became of that? To the naive me it seems like this can just be a mount option for ufs. Thanks! -mi