From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 16:39:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FCF16A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B0843FCB for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:39:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB80dH5x049155; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 01:39:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB80dHe2049154; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 01:39:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Mike Patterson In-Reply-To: <3FD3C69A.3090501@cs.uwaterloo.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> <3FD3C69A.3090501@cs.uwaterloo.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8Z/krhSs7lkrHyR1K5YQ" Message-Id: <1070843957.78821.13.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 01:39:17 +0100 cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 00:39:23 -0000 --=-8Z/krhSs7lkrHyR1K5YQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable V po, 08. 12. 2003 v 01:32, Mike Patterson p=ED=B9e: > > Rather than maintainer field you should pursue Whom: from port Makefile= s > > headers. >=20 > Not that it really matters to me, but if somebody contributes a port and=20 > then drops it, and somebody else takes it over, why should that somebody=20 > else not get credit for that, if credit is to be assigned? Maintaining=20 > is just as important as the original submission, no? I misunderstood your point. I was under impression you only want to complete the list by adding missing entries under current "rules" [1]. If you're about to add all authors *and* maintainers than it's completely different question. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting= .html --=20 Pav Lucistnik --=-8Z/krhSs7lkrHyR1K5YQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/08g1ntdYP8FOsoIRAlRFAJ9ehsGcW5RASFu+auGgE7AMmSsfuACgkaww 4L0r11bYRrlrKS8/ZvplLf0= =2AmO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8Z/krhSs7lkrHyR1K5YQ--