From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 5 16:18:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE96106564A for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172058FC0C for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so4464504pbb.13 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:18:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lsSPYdjhJkdPwL8ZR86oVAjRC5fBH5hbImmr/jr+6l4=; b=VfnfkUvBRCfIi6uOjdnC+UT2E8g8N57j6CPBz1H6BMB24fQMpBBEfNMeEahVRQT8kR nZu2uaZaGLDdOXnlvBKYHxVhrUSkiwsmApKPaWT/IDeSu/5LDf35dS/JfYXt0WH7FyyD infOP7tDnMJGl+hdV7cRVY9VHB2KP4wCj00Xo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=lsSPYdjhJkdPwL8ZR86oVAjRC5fBH5hbImmr/jr+6l4=; b=aKr7iY4l5odidG1Qesmpa2UAkh92B4n9+zSiLIUXc7enL/paFU3IZHIClHPobH0p3y sALIO7KvejBv0KKlKtjUnQR0e2EYR9bKCIUz1/awaqDlpDedXcQoi1PutR9/NdrXpTri Ze1fCRtJJqfAaALPYHX1N04feYzxlTqiBBrzzJiBVN9u/ND+kIF0JAAXARiWd6Ghl3bZ O0Q601qSCdg15k3ksZI5b37zBIoXfPNwuR95uj7Kl9FLSqunY3KPSpn72r0BD2oQEOGr 1D9uu6gbf8TiQkX+fW2mYA6+MBAO1O469iezkxeNgEMexiouBPkYTvPFpbMZ3bG49Zcy K6gw== Received: by 10.68.218.101 with SMTP id pf5mr12555529pbc.60.1344183516486; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:18:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.67.52 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:18:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120805121519.1f69cebf@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <501C7572.3020707@FreeBSD.org> <20120804141607.55249f62@gumby.homeunix.com> <501D34DF.2070205@FreeBSD.org> <20120804232102.201cde8e@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120805121519.1f69cebf@gumby.homeunix.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 09:18:05 -0700 Message-ID: To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnq3sgeGbUF+7yaIT50VJnNv9Skzy9HJAo+nrNbu01t0olQNQtai5S2vgl5GeHb+BxKM53c Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] [bsd.port.mk] ports ccache build support X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:18:37 -0000 On 5 August 2012 04:15, RW wrote: > On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 17:38:44 -0700 > Eitan Adler wrote: > Why isn't it? In that scenario /var/cache wouldn't be writable. IMHO the directories used by the ports system should be predictable and static. Which user you happen to be shouldn't affect that choice. -- Eitan Adler