From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 28 18:41:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA29838 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA29833 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA21178; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:41:43 -0700 (PDT) To: ser@hon.hn cc: FreeBSD Hackers Mailing List Subject: Re: Help with Bocaboard 2016 silo overflow's In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Aug 1996 17:47:04 +0600." <322431B8.3346@hon.hn> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 18:41:43 -0700 Message-ID: <21176.841282903@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I have tried different speeds from 19200 up to 115200 without luck. Hmmmm. What happens if you transfer data from the serial port but just throw it immediately away, e.g. don't attempt to copy anything to/from the disk. If the silo overflows go away in this case then it's likely that the IDE disk is hogging things and you should probably swap it for a SCSI model. Otherwise, I have no idea. I run 115.2K on a standard 16550 equipped serial port all day long and I get no silo overflows at all on a P5/133. Jordan