From owner-cvs-all  Wed Sep 29  8:10:51 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from arc.hq.cti.ru (arc.hq.cti.ru [195.34.40.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 124E21525A; Wed, 29 Sep 1999 08:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru)
Received: from arc.hq.cti.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arc.hq.cti.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA67807;
	Wed, 29 Sep 1999 19:02:31 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru)
Message-Id: <199909291502.TAA67807@arc.hq.cti.ru>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>,
	Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>,
	Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>,
	Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libtermcap termcap.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Sep 1999 10:49:18 EDT."
             <199909291449.KAA19308@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 19:02:31 +0400
From: Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> <<On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:41:14 +0400, Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru> said:
> 
> > The whole purpose of the sigbal-related code in getcwd.c, res_send.c and
> > termcap.c is binary compatibility with the FreeBSD 2.2 (and below) kernels.
> 
> That is about to go by the wayside, since we are about to change all
> of the signal-related system calls.

Yeah, so I still wonder what the sigemptyset() vs bzero() changes was supposed 
to achieve...

Dima




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message