From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 28 00:43:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD7CAD7; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF7AD0E; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hm11so2922217wib.3 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ivtuaT2yM1fc6t7KWtfse8XM2dZ63RCxv6d7jOoPtT4=; b=Hln6Zgx3FTz1+hXq18bR8jQHlO80dauPPLSVQnj9kUcLiV4a31JYM6HsiloSnS6s6h TaykxWochrB6BK+SWWfGfs+VwsnEEHrMq+1KqYEzdWtZSi9+XWD9zHBNO7ZlUyvlqUhm siNNSHH49Dkdz3A43LMJUBwJTYq6gh1alWwtxCvFSfbcfymOsdHSSaqpUuRI7bxCpZpO 9H0Qbv7cvaI02/etPDzigZ6y9I+fWbEp15YEPBOU4sRm4cbUPrJzvuq2r713kbGwxhs1 9So08Q/g+WvmQO5zjoATzpwijq7lxXzVgFHenBfZRz/vZ7t1pksw2eKJ7I5YyCDxquWC dp1A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.13.34 with SMTP id e2mr13092100wic.29.1364431387607; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.108.130 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51536306.5030907@FreeBSD.org> References: <51536306.5030907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:43:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2YHBwHaFP9ql5MKmHWlQbxxp-io Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack? From: Adrian Chadd To: Alexander Motin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:43:09 -0000 My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code. It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful. Thanks, adrian