From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 21 23:16:55 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ABA106566C
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6DE8FC17
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:16:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1LNE4Om048302;
	Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com)
Message-ID: <4D62F267.3000706@rawbw.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:16:55 -0800
From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101211 Thunderbird/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bf1783@gmail.com
References: <AANLkTi=xLRuiEm_zZNOtnFFUX0_UoqRGq2Fb6ZLS2h+p@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=xLRuiEm_zZNOtnFFUX0_UoqRGq2Fb6ZLS2h+p@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>,
	"b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD ABI?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:16:55 -0000

On 02/21/2011 14:47, b. f. wrote:
> Isn't it supposed to [1] conform to:
>
> http://www.sco.com/developers/devspecs/abi386-4.pdf
> http://www.x86-64.org/documentation/abi.pdf
>
> ?
>
> [1] See, for example:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2011-January/034045.html
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1_s.S
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2010-December/023065.html
>    

Solaris-i386 ABI is also supposed to conform to abi386-4.pdf.
In section 3-10 it says: "The stack is word aligned. Although the 
architecture does not require any alignment of the stack, software 
convention and the operating system requires that the stack be aligned 
on a word boundary."
But I know for the fact that Solaris-i386 uses 16 byte alignment. At 
least that's what gcc-4.5.2 thinks when on Solaris.

Still not sure about FreeBSD-i386.

Yuri