From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 30 09:19:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEE21065675; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18D38FC08; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz ([212.24.129.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAU9J7eZ034355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:19:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4ED5F505.5070104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:19:01 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111021 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <201111292232.pATMWINp021704@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111130015504.GB3953@FreeBSD.org> <20111130090313.00003930@unknown> <20111130080947.GA95193@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org> <20111130091253.GB4340@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111130091253.GB4340@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 212.24.129.198; Sender-helo: pav.hide.vol.cz; ) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pawe? P?kala Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts Makefile ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro/files pkg-message.in X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:19:10 -0000 On 2011/11/30 10:12, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> Especially if "mixed" name looks just plain dumb and ugly. We should not >>> uphold upstream's stupidity. >> >> No no. We should mirror the upstream as closely as possible. > > Please don't pass your personal opinions as project policies, thank you. :-) I'm thinking you would be happier in Debian. > Seriously, you really think that e.g. `audio/deadbeef' port (and plethora of > others) should be named `audio/deaDBeeF' (official name is DeaDBeeF)? > > (In case of DeaDBeeF I do not consider this name stupid at all. It just > does not fit as is into ports collection.) Since it is the official capitalization used by vendor, I would not oppose audio/deaDBeeF neither audio/DeaDBeeF (preferred). -- Pav Lucistnik