From owner-cvs-all Fri Feb 19 10:45:30 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFDE118F2; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:45:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA01045; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:45:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:45:22 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199902191845.KAA01045@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: David Greenman , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm swap_pager.c References: <199902191819.LAA07479@pluto.plutotech.com> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Gentlemen, I'm juggling four different patch sets on my machine... that's *AFTER* the commit. It's hard enough juggling multiple patch sets, even harder if a commit cannot be made on a timely basis. The compromise of the original commit is simple: The commit had to occur, the majority of the elements in the commit were approved. I made a compromise and committed it as is with a provisio, made *extremely* clear in email, that we could remove the cruft in two weeks. This was to get the damn patch set out of the way in order to be able to move onto other things. Now, unless all of *you*, and especially you, DG, are juggling multiple patch sets, you really have no call to yell and scream over what is an extremely minor and resolveable ( indeed, resolved if one is willing to wait 2 weeks ) problem. I am getting wholely sick and tired of these reactionary postings, especially postings made by people who should know better. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message