From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 23 10:52:06 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B16D16A41F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:52:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF03343D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:52:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946CE61EA;
	Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:51:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F366193;
	Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:51:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id C68D333D44; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:51:57 +0200 (CEST)
To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
References: <20050821084546.GA77111@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
	<20050821175406.GA36164@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<868xyu3wln.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<20050822161339.GA13907@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20050823102623.GA97332@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:51:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20050823102623.GA97332@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's
	message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:26:23 +0200")
Message-ID: <86hddhvsc2.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -5.2/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no
Cc: current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: fdalloc optimization
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:52:06 -0000

Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> writes:
> here is my analyze of the problem - if its correct then the patch
> speeds it up

I agree in theory, but I'll bet you a beer that you can't measure the
improvement.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no