From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 23 22:29:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266581065678 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA13A8FC17 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3523915C for ; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:03:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id 52D2210051; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B201004F for ; Sat, 24 May 2008 00:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 00:03:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LSU 1026 2008-04-08) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: How to handle RCs in terms of PORTVERSION and friends? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 22:29:06 -0000 Right now I find myself in the situation that Wine went into RC mode and the current snapshots are of the form 1.0-rc1, 1.0-rc2 etc. Per the Porters Handbook this means I have prepared an update with PORTVERSION= 1.0r1 This works just fine and is higher than the previous releases of the form 0.9.61. However, what is going to happen with version 1.0 a bit later? % pkg_version -t 0.9.61 1.0r1 < % pkg_version -t 1.0r1 1.0 > How can I best address this? I'm sure I am not the first ports maintainer running into an issue like this, and bumping EPOCH does not look like the desirable solution here. Gerald @FreeBSD.org