From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Sep 18 21:05:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C0BA00022 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8BEB1FF4; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Zd2qq-000MkN-8q; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:05:48 +0300 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 00:05:48 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Stefan Wendler , Michael Gmelin , freebsd-current Subject: Re: Intel Haswell support - Any updates? Message-ID: <20150918210548.GV3158@zxy.spb.ru> References: <2081067.PSnZzq08Cl@hactar> <50359452-B6FC-4A04-9FFE-279D8A9F661E@freebsd.org> <1887869.RclIo8uMx7@hactar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:05:53 -0000 On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:50:16PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > Just run -HEAD. Outside of occasional hiccups, a whole bunch of us use > it for day to day work, and it works fine. Some years ago -HEAD break may be one at month, now -HEAD break some times at week, and, may be, persistent break (em/igb, callout, i915 on 945G (yes, this is also break on -stable, but on stable simple revert two commit and will be nice, on -head you got many coomits)). Development is ipmotant and development w/o breaks imposibles, but current -HEAD not to agree with genareal user.