From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 21:23:05 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC8C5EF
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:23:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152A0DE6
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:23:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0DLN4WR003120
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:23:04 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 196501] [em] Intel 82573 nic built on my pdsbm-ln2 1U server
 and only one port will work.
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:23:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: jhb@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-196501-2472-mh3jCLfFcD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196501-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-196501-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 21:23:05 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196501

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jhb@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #5 from John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ---
Try setting 'hint.agp.0.disabled=1' in loader.conf.  agp0 allocates a page of
address space that causes a trickle down effect where em0 and em1 have to
allocate different BARs.

That said, em0/1 should be able to cope with the alternate BARs, though it may
be that em0 doesn't work because em1's bridge is still decoding those addresses
when em0 tries to probe.  I bet that if we forced em0 to reattach it would
actually work ok (e.g using my devctl thing that isn't in the tree yet).

Ultimately this is a PCI bus bug, not an em(4) issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.