From owner-cvs-all Wed Jun 30 13:13:54 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCAD14C07; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:13:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA74237; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:13:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Bill Fumerola Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc services In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:12:36 EDT." Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:13:02 -0700 Message-ID: <74233.930773582@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Bah, don't make me come over there and slap you unconscious with a fresh halibut. :) You know as well as I do that the end-users of our product don't make such distinctions, they just want FreeBSD to interoperate with the rest of the world as seamlessly as possible. This would hardly be the only compromise currently in FreeBSD dedicated to that principal, nor the worst by far. - Jordan > On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Bay Networks aren't the only people who still use the "old defaults" > > and this is honestly a case of the "right" being the enemy of the > > "good". I'll need more justification than mere technical correctness > > (that appears to be unobserved by the industry) to revert this back. > > An operating system that is controlled by incorrect vendors? Where have I > heard that one before. > > - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - > - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message