From owner-cvs-all  Fri Feb 19 11:11:50 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from xa.rich.org (216-119-137-36.ipset17.wt.net [216.119.137.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9188E11AF1; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 11:09:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rich@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from rich@localhost)
	by xa.rich.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA06138;
	Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:07:17 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from rich@xa.rich.org)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 13:07:17 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199902191907.NAA06138@xa.rich.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: xa.rich.org: rich set sender to rich@xa.rich.org using -f
From: Murphey <rich@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: dillon@apollo.backplane.com
Cc: gibbs@plutotech.com, dg@root.com, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199902191824.KAA00876@apollo.backplane.com> (message from
	Matthew Dillon on Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:24:21 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm swap_pager.c
Reply-To: rich@FreeBSD.org
References: <199902191819.LAA07479@pluto.plutotech.com> <199902191824.KAA00876@apollo.backplane.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Matt,

It's a waste of time for you to attack David.  He isn't
anti-social, he does compromise, and he's the Principal
Architect.

You should listen to him.

Rich


>Delivered-To: rich@freebsd.org
>Delivered-To: cvs-committers@freebsd.org
>Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:24:21 -0800 (PST)
>From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
>Cc: David Greenman <dg@root.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
>	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
>
>
>:
>:>    Huh?  Read my original email.
>:>
>:>    I comitted a compromise with a provisio that we could remove the 
>:>    cruft in 2 weeks if it turned out to be useless.
>:
>:A "compromise" involving only one of the parties is not a compromise.
>:
>:>    *I* at least
>:>    am willing to compromise.  All you seem to do is scream bloody murder
>:>    at everything --- when you cry wolf that often, you should not be 
>:>    surprised if people start ignoring you.
>:
>:You are the only one who seems to feel justified in ignoring the concerns
>:and objections of our Principle Architect.  Perhaps you don't understand
>:the weight carried by that position, but the David's judgment is binding on
>
>    Complete and utter bullshit.  If you will just STOP and *read* my 
>    email rather then being reactionary, you will note that I left plenty
>    of room in to remove the cruft... after 2 weeks.  *NOT* now.
>
>    I did not unilaterly decide that the cruft would remain in forever.
>
>    And, I would like to point out, that it works both ways... when all
>    DG does it veto every damn thing that comes across his desk, it's just
>    as useless and anti social as if I were to ignore him.  It's like having
>    a one way conversation --- I feel as though every single comment I make
>    is going into the bit bucket.
>
>    You seem to make it seem as though every commit I've ever made is 
>    somehow going against the grain of what FreeBSD is meant to be.  I
>    *challenge* you to review those commits and tell me what percentage
>    of them you think are bad.  Are you willing to do that?  No?  You 
>    aren't, are you?  You don't know what the hell I've committed, do you?
>    You are just being reactionary.
>
>						-Matt
>
>
>
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message