From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 2 01:24:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 43C4248E; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 01:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 01:24:54 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Re: svn commit: r325922 - in head/devel/gdb: . files Message-ID: <20130902012454.GC43972@FreeBSD.org> References: <201309012231.r81MViDe036729@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201309012231.r81MViDe036729@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 01:24:54 -0000 On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 10:31:44PM +0000, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > New Revision: 325922 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/325922 > > -ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 # untested elsewhere, might work > +ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64 powerpc powerpc64 # untested elsewhere, might work If the comment really stands true, I don't see any point for ONLY_FOR_ARCHS. ./danfe