From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan  8 16:01:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3672B16A4CE; Sat,  8 Jan 2005 16:01:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com
	[81.103.67.204])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C560443D48; Sat,  8 Jan 2005 16:01:35 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net)
Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.43
	(FreeBSD))	id 1CnJ1y-0006B5-Vn; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:01:34 +0000
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:01:34 +0000
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050108160134.GR49329@submonkey.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>,
	Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>,
	Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
References: <20050108155045.568E716A4D0@hub.freebsd.org>
	<2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dvv5THrRrdqidt0E"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr>
X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Sender: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/BBMan Makefile ports/chinese/CJK
	Makefile ports/chinese/arnettf Makefile ports/chinese/arphicttf
	Makefile ports/chinese/auto-tw-l10n Makefile ports/chinese/bg5pdf
	Makefile ports/chinese/big5fs Makefile ports/chinese/chinput3 ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:01:36 -0000


--dvv5THrRrdqidt0E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:58:33PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +-le 08/01/2005 15:50 +0000, Sergey Matveychuk ?crivait :
> |   Log:
> |   - Pass maintainership to submitter
>=20
> I fail to see the point of such a commit, I mean, without any update to t=
he
> ports. Giving a port to someone making an update is good, but giving a wh=
ole
> bunch of ports just for giving them is doing no good I think.

It means that people (and the numerous nag scripts) can contact the
correct maintainer, and that PRs don't get assigned to the wrong person.
That's plenty reason enough.

Ceri
--=20
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.			  -- Einstein (attrib.)

--dvv5THrRrdqidt0E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFB4APeocfcwTS3JF8RAl+VAJ9InkhvpsFIGpN7sJEWXKPGOp2RogCdHaZY
oRXtTuSTiWuAwsQnp/EI9rw=
=w7IS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dvv5THrRrdqidt0E--