From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May  3 19:36:27 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA13848
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 3 May 1995 19:36:27 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA13821
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 3 May 1995 19:35:59 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id MAA30923; Thu, 4 May 1995 12:29:04 +1000
Date: Thu, 4 May 1995 12:29:04 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199505040229.MAA30923@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, patl@asimov.lashley.slip.netcom.com,
        rpt@miles.sso.loral.com
Subject: Re: GNU cpp bug with pthreads
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Actually, if you really want to be safe, it should be:

>	#if defined(__STDC__) && (__STDC__ == 1)

Nope.  There are probably more compilers that don't support && than
ones that don't default all undefined variables to 0.

>There is (or was) at least one non-conforming compiler that set
>__STDC__ to 2.  (And at least one that would complain if you
>tried '(__STDC__ == 1)' when __STDC__ hasn't been set at all...)

It's very non-conforming :-).

Bruce