From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Aug 2 18: 1:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from arutam.inch.com (ns.inch.com [207.240.140.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537EE1509B for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 18:01:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freyes@inch.com) Received: from your-name (freyes.static.inch.com [207.240.212.43]) by arutam.inch.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/UTIL-INCH-2.0.0) with SMTP id VAA29833; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 21:00:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199908030100.VAA29833@arutam.inch.com> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "David Scheidt" , "Terry Lambert" Cc: "chat@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 21:01:19 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Professional (2.01.1600) For Windows 98 (4.10.1998) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: BSD lightness: Free/Net/Open Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 2 Aug 1999 20:13:02 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert wrote: >They were 386-SX/16's with only 4M of memory each, and 512k of >video RAM. Given that then I am beggining to feel more hopefull those 486s will do the job. :-) >This was back in the 1.1.5.1 days, using a stripped kernel and >netboot.exe What is netboot.exe? What part of the kernel did you "strip out"? Wouldn't a custom kernel do the job or are there savings to be made from taking certain things out? I would be hesitant to even try taking things out of the kernel.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message