From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Nov 11 19:08:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA12993 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:08:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cbn.net.id (portland.cbn.net.id [202.158.3.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA12988 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:08:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lukman.salim@usa.net) Received: (qmail 13794 invoked from network); 12 Nov 1998 03:17:38 -0000 Received: from ip28-97.cbn.net.id (HELO int-server.indonusa.co.id) (202.158.28.97) by portland.cbn.net.id with SMTP; 12 Nov 1998 03:17:37 -0000 Received: from usa.net (lukman.indonusa.co.id [192.168.1.9]) by int-server.indonusa.co.id (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA21621 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 10:13:42 +0700 Message-ID: <364A4EC5.EBDD266B@usa.net> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 09:58:13 +0700 From: Lukman Salim X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win98; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Using NAT for ISP customer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I will be starting a cable-modem based ISP in the near future. Because of the potential concurrent online user among the cable modem user would be a lot greater than traditional ISP, I'm thinking of using local IP with NAT for those who don't need real IP. Has anyone had any experience with such a scheme using FreeBSD's natd? I know that some apps would not run, but does the majority of Internet user use such software? Thanks in advance! Lukman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message