From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 19 20:52:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12584544 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF30BEB for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7CBF433C24; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:52:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos Subject: Re: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? References: Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:52:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos's message of "Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:31:33 +0300") Message-ID: <44pplhc3mw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:52:41 -0000 Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos writes: >> From: jorgeassembler1@outlook.com >> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org >> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300 >> >> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD >> and many other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD >> developers take great pride in the system man pages. The man pages >> are the authoritative source of OpenBSD documentation -- not this >> FAQ, not third-party independently maintained pages, not "HOWTO"s, >> etc. " >> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > > because no one responds? I see no reason to disagree with OpenBSD's FAQ answer. I would give the same answer for FreeBSD, although maybe not quite as strongly.