From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 31 15:35:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA18288 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 15:35:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA18262 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 15:35:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA02470; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 15:34:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 15:34:36 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: Glenn Beach cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Internal Clock In-Reply-To: <333F6EF4.7DE7@cybernet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Glenn Beach wrote: > I was referred to this e-mail by Peter da Siva at a BSD FAQ. He > suggested that I ask you the following question: > > How can I make time measurements in increments smaller than the clock > tick? Specifically, I am running BSD on a Pentium PC which has 128 > clock ticks per second. Is there any way to improve the resolution? Ask hackers@freebsd.org about high-resolution timers. There is better than the clock IRQ, I'd hope. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major