From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jan 18 8:28:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4B837B416 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0IGPbA12161; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:25:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Alexander Kabaev Cc: mux@sneakerz.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal for a new mount API In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:22:24 EST." <20020118112224.236b4754.ak03@gte.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:25:37 +0100 Message-ID: <12159.1011371137@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020118112224.236b4754.ak03@gte.com>, Alexander Kabaev writes: >> No, all mount options are passed in elements of the iovec. >Then what is flags doing in the nmount prototype? And the patch posted >certainly does not work like you described. I belive what you see is the backwards compatibility stuff. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message