From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 10 16:01:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9E616A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:01:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail19a.dulles19-verio.com (mail19a.dulles19-verio.com [198.170.241.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D99C643D2D for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:01:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rob@pythonemproject.com) Received: from www.pythonemproject.com (198.104.176.109)2-0415293277 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:01:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <404FAC50.6070603@pythonemproject.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:01:20 -0800 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chat@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Loop-Detect: 1 Subject: What makes Centrino so fast? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:01:21 -0000 I have my own benchmark program that I use for number crunching. It uses a mixture of Python and Numeric Python. Athlon 2166Mhz as reported by OS: 2m38.7s Intel Centrino Pentium 1700 Mhz: 2m17s Is it just compiler optimization at play? Sincerely, Rob