From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 05:57:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7416F387 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 05:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4397C8FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 05:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([108.211.168.178]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id qA25RfEH057445; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:27:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <201211020214.UAA29489@lariat.net> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:27:35 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <040B042A-EDD1-4639-BD21-CCB97A410C21@lafn.org> References: <201211020214.UAA29489@lariat.net> To: Brett Glass X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 05:57:06 -0000 On 1 November 2012, at 19:14, Brett Glass wrote: > I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how > FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and > robust than 9.0-RELEASE? It appears to be for me. I had problems with 9.0 not reading CDs and = rebooting with no error messages frequently. I have upgraded to 9.1-RC2 = and it now reads CDs just fine, and has not rebooted. However, the = uptimes with 9.0 ranged from about 2 hours to 30 days. I have only had = 9.1-RC2 running for a couple weeks so have not declared victory yet. I = has been running for more than most of the uptimes already. > Are there issues that will have to wait > until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome. I have no information on this.